This is one of those blog posts that is more of a mental memory dump. I was thinking the other day that I've owned a lot of cars throughout the years, but I've never actually taken the time to count them. There are also a few of them that are a bit blurry as far as the year or exact model, so I felt it was a good idea to just go ahead and write them down once and for all.
1986 Chevy Cavalier CS
This was my first car that my dad bought for me. Technically he bought it for my sister and it was handed down to me a couple of years later, but who was I to complain. It wasn't the sportiest car around, and it was nothing more than a typical four door econobox, but I loved it just the same.
It had a white exterior and red/maroon interior and originally it came with a AM/FM radio with two speakers in the dash. No tape deck, no rear speakers... just a AM/FM radio. There were no power locks, no power windows, no rear window defrost, and no keyless entry. Heated seats hadn't even been invented yet, and the term airbag was something associated with politicians rather than automobile safety. The Cavalier had a 2.0 liter four cylinder engine that produced a whopping 86 horsepower (thank you Wikipedia), and yet I still managed to get something like three speeding tickets while driving it.
Eventually my father paid to have a tape deck installed and some rear speakers, and I actually felt that stereo was pretty nice. A few years later when CD players became the norm, I installed a CD player and then proceeded to install various amps and speakers to ensure my neighbors hated me each and every time I arrived home.
I was involved in my first accident in this car during a winter storm. The car in front of me lost control on an icy road and slid sideways blocking traffic, and I in turn bumped into the side of their car because I couldn't stop in time. It was a minor no-fault accident and the only thing that was damaged on my car was the plastic bumper... along with my ego. Months later I was rear-ended by a different car while I was sitting at a stop sign and it practically destroyed my car. I still remember it was $2600 in damage which doesn't seem like a lot now, but in the early 90s it was probably about half what the car was worth at the time. The accident blew out my rear window and pushed the rear fenders up into the rear tires along with causing significant damage to the trunk, bumper, and taillight areas. Eventually the car was fixed, but I continued to find little bits of broken glass each time I vacuumed the interior even months later.
At one point in my high school life I ended up foolishly attempting to drive through a puddle out by a lake and the car stalled. The interior filled up with muddy stagnant water and I ended up having to walk to a nearby home and call a friend to come get me. Eventually I was able to tow the car out and it started just fine, but the next several weeks involved a lot of vacuuming with a shop vac to pull the nasty water out of the water logged carpeting, several different types of carpet deodorizer, and a continual need to drive with my windows open regardless of the weather due to the unpleasant smell. I think I eventually got it all cleaned up, but I swear on a hot day there was still a little aura of swamp stench in the air. Good times.
Everyone has a special place in their heart for their first car, and part of me wishes I could find it because it would be neat to own again, however the reality is I'm 99.7% sure this car has long since been crushed and recycled into something a lot whole more useful than a 86 Cavalier.
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais
The Olds was a car my step-mom drove while I was in high school, and because it was a two-door and had a few extra horsepower on top of what I had in the Cavalier, I thought it was a pretty nice car. When I was in my freshmen year of college my dad offered me a deal that I could buy the car by giving him my Cavalier plus $1000 cash. At the time it was a pretty good deal, so I jumped at the opportunity.
The major issue with this car was the fact it was this horrible brownish orange copper color. Sure in 1987 it was probably ok, but when I owned the car (circa 1994) that copper color was incredibly ugly, and it seemed anytime you saw a copper colored GM car it was probably a 1987, so I'm assuming this particular color was not a great seller since it only seemed to last that one model year. For whatever reason about a year later when I bought my next car, my dad wanted this thing back so I sold it back to him. I think they drove it for a couple more years and eventually passed it on to another relative.... I never heard what happened to it, but I'm pretty sure it is either sitting in a shelterbelt somewhere or it was melted down to make new manhole covers.
1983 Mazda RX-7
Sometime around 1993 or 94 my brother Dean had purchased this RX-7 and he was ready to get rid of it a short time later. I loved the idea of a small sporty car, and I loved the idea of a manual transmission, so we worked out a deal where I traded him a laptop computer and a few hundred bucks for the car. My father thought I was nuts because it was several years older than the Olds, but to a teenage kid there was no comparison between an Olds and a RX-7.
I loved driving this car, and I have a lot of great memories with it. It wasn't the fastest car around, but it handled well so I managed to get into trouble from time to time. I even had a little incident that involved being unsuccessfully pursued by one of Mitchell's finest which looking back upon probably could have landed me in jail. Who knew that driving about three times the speed limit is typically frowned upon? Granted not pulling over when you see flashing lights is even worse, but I'm pretty sure the statute of limitations is up so I can probably admit to it now.
Also, due to the car being so low to the ground I was actually able to drive under the barriers they used to close down the public beach at the lake which meant I could park at the beach at night without ever worrying about being bothered. Years later I was told they modified the barriers and thinned the trees so you could see the parking lot from the road all because of rumors that people were driving under the barriers when the beach was closed... I suppose that is part of my legacy.
One feature of the RX-7 that I always loved was the fact it had a manual choke. This is something that was almost unheard of at that time, and I still remember pulling on the choke in order to start the car in the winter. As the car would heat up you could push the choke in further and further until it was closed, but if you left it wide open and came up to a stop sign, as soon as you pushed the clutch in the engine would rev up. It took a while to get used to, but it was just one of those things that made the car special and unique.
Unfortunately the RX-7 was a maintenance nightmare and it required something to be fixed or replaced about every other week. The AC never worked and was way too expensive to fix, and eventually the car started burning so much oil that I feared OPEC would start sending me Christmas cards. It had some electrical quirks that were impossible to trace down, it was starting to show many signs of significant rust, so I figured it might be time to look into something a bit more reliable.
By the time I traded the RX-7 in, the fuel tank would start leaking if you filled the car up more than half way, the rear bearings were howling and needed to be replaced, the AC still didn't work, the car would not downshift into second gear and would often grind a bit when upshifting, the APEX seals on the rotary engine were all but shot, and I'm sure there were at least 20 other things wrong with it. It was fun while it lasted, and I'm sure I was responsible for many of the things that were wrong with the car simply because I was so hard on it. However all good things come to an end, and I ended up trading it off on my next car. The funny thing was that they gave me $1800 in trade-in value which was far more than the car was worth at the time, and was more than Dean had paid to buy the car a few years earlier.
1989 Chevy Cavalier Z24
I bought this car in 1995 or so and I must say I loved it from day one. It was a two door and it had a V6 which was actually pretty powerful for its day. It had a maroon exterior with some gold accents along with a black interior. I spent a lot of time and money on the stereo and to this day I've never had a stereo that was as loud or as nice as what I had in this car.
For all intents and purposes the car was actually pretty reliable. It wasn't horrible on gas (although my driving style probably didn't help matters), and it was comfortable. This is probably one of those cars I wish I would have kept longer, but I have often been guilty of simply getting bored with my cars and feeling the need to trade for something else. I suspect another reason I ended up trading is because at one point I was stuck in a snowbank for four hours during a blizzard which made me think I should really have something that was 4WD. The day after that little blizzard I was stuck in a different snowbank when a woman in a minivan rear ended me. Thankfully the accident was relatively minor and it was ruled her fault, plus it has given me some good stories to tell, so it really wasn't a huge deal even if I wasn't so impressed at the time.
1995 Jeep Wrangler Rio Grande
I think Jeep Wranglers are one of those vehicles that everyone should probably own once. What's not to love about something as versatile as a 4WD convertible that has a trailer hitch?
The biggest mistake I made with buying the Wrangler was buying the four cylinder engine rather than the V6. I think that engine had something like 115hp, and due to the total lack of an aerodynamic shape, it honestly struggled to hit 75 on the Interstate. In fact at one point I tried pulling a trailer out to Rapid City to deliver some furniture to my sister and brother in law, and there were points even with the pedal to the floor I was unable to hit 65mph.
The other main issue with this idiotic vehicle was the fact I was so in love with the idea of owning a Jeep that I ignored the fact that it was bright orange. Officially Jeep called this "Bright Mango" and it was a very, very rare color. I'd like to think it was rare because it was a limited edition or something, but I'm fairly certain the only reason it was rare is because it was ugly. In the right light it looked orange, but other times it looked red, and I even had someone ask me if it was pink (I'm assuming that person was colorblind, but you never know).
My Jeep did have the hardtop, and I purchased a softtop for summer use. It was also a manual transmission which was perfectly fine for day to day use, but the few times I went off-road it was less than ideal. Of course I soon found out that in the winter time Jeeps are essentially worthless because of the short wheelbase and lack of weight. The other negative was the heating system in a Jeep was superb at roasting a person's feet while they were freezing from the waist up, and even with the hard top installed there were still gaps and cracks that resulted in a cool breeze blowing through the passenger cabin at highway speeds. To make matters worse, the Jeep was horrible on gas at any speed above 35 and because I was commuting about 30 miles each direction at the time, it wasn't exactly efficient.
1998 Chevy Cavalier Z24
This Z24 was my first new car. I bought it in late 1997 and at the time I was incredibly proud. I think the purchase price was right around $17,000 which was a lot for me at the time, but I made it work. This was my third Cavalier which probably tells you I had fond memories of the first two, and I honestly have to say this was probably one of the most reliable vehicles I have ever owned. In fact during the time I owned it, the only thing that ever broke was the latch to the glovebox. Mechanically speaking aside from routine maintenance and a couple sets of tires I never had to spend a dime on the car.
The Cavalier was bright red with a gray interior, and I opted for the 5-speed manual transmission. Chevy had started using four cylinder engines in the newer Cavaliers so it didn't feel quite as powerful as the V6 in my previous Z24, but it was plenty peppy and fun to drive. I even drove this car from Rapid City to San Diego and back again only stopping for gas and food... it was over 26 hours each direction and the car never let me down. Note this is not something I would recommend someone do, but I was young and stupid, and there was a girl involved. Enough said.
Anyway the car was very good on gas, it treated me well, and I drove it over 87,000 miles in four and a half years. I owned that car longer than any other vehicle, and I have no regrets about buying it. If anything I probably should have kept it longer since it was such a great car.
1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited
Looking back buying this Jeep was a really, really bad idea. It was fairly expensive to buy, and it was one of the most unreliable vehicles I have ever owned. Within the first month I owned it I had to take it in twice to have issues worked on which thankfully were covered under warranty. Then it seemed that almost once a month I was taking it in to the dealership for one thing or another. It was a very comfortable vehicle, I liked the styling, I liked the color, and it had a large V8 engine that made boatloads of power... so had the thing actually been able to go six months without a trip to the dealership I might have kept it longer.
The truth is I still have a soft spot for Jeeps, but based upon this particular vehicle I haven't been willing to take another gamble. Whenever I see a similar body style Jeep driving along the road I always feel sense of pity towards the owner knowing they are probably on a first-name basis with the service advisor at their local Jeep dealership.
1990 Volkswagen Jetta Wolfsburg Edition
This Jetta was a gigantic pile of crap, and is by far the worst vehicle I ever owned. I bought it from the back lot of a dealership because they were sending it to auction. That probably should have been a clue that it wasn't worth buying, but if I recall correctly they only wanted $1500 for the car. This was going to be a second car for me in addition to the Jeep, and the goal was to just have something I could drive to work without worrying about door dings. At the time I was parking in a ramp where the spaces were very small, and I was do a lot of driving from building to building for work... so the idea of a small economical car was very appealing to me.
I kid you not - after I signed the papers to buy this rolling disaster I was on my way back home when a warning light and buzzer came on indicating low oil pressure. This light would come on at any time the car was at idle, and the only way to stop it was to rev the engine, so you can imagine sitting at a stoplight was less than pleasant. There were a handful of other things wrong with the car too, but for $1500 I thought I could afford to put a little money into it. I paid a visit to a junkyard and picked up a few parts, and then I took it to a local indy mechanic who did a few things for me. However - the more I drove it, the worse it got and it slowly became clear it was going to nickel and dime me to death.
It was nice to drive a car that I didn't have to bother locking the doors on, but it was not nice being worried that you weren't going to make it across town before it broke down.
1996 Ford Probe GT
One day when I was driving the Jetta I drove past a local user car dealer that had a dark red Ford Probe GT on the lot. Years earlier a friend of mine had one (well technically it was his mom's car but he drove it much of the time) and I had always loved those cars. There was something about the styling of them and just the way they drove that I really, really liked.
So there I was staring at this Probe and a saleswoman approached. We spoke about it for a few minutes and she offered me the keys for a test drive. I can still remember to this day being so impressed at how much power the car had and how it seemed to lurch when the RPMs hit 3500 or so. It was such a violent surge of power that I actually opened the hood and searched for a turbocharger thinking a previous owner may have installed one.
The idea of having another manual transmission was a nice bonus, and the overall allure of the car was simply too much. I ended up agreeing to a trade and soon enough the Probe was mine while the Jetta would be retired. At this point I had only owned the Jetta less than two months and I didn't even get the title in the mail yet.... but I knew the Probe was a much better option.
As with most of my cars, I spent some time fixing a few things that previous owners had overlooked, and I bought a few parts from junkyards to get things just how I wanted them. I really did enjoy driving the car and for the most part it treated me well. The problem I had was that at this point I had two fairly nice cars... the Jeep and the Probe, and I was considering the purchase of a motorcycle so one of the cars had to go.
I tried to sell the Jeep for quite some time, but had little success, so eventually I tried to sell the Probe and it sold fairly quick. As with most of my old cars I sort of miss having it, and if I ever saw a nice clean Ford Probe GT sitting on a lot I might be tempted to pick one up just for fun... but I doubt that will ever happen.
2003 Volkswagen Jetta 1.8T
This was another new car that I bought when I started to realize the Jeep was probably not the best vehicle for me. I wanted to get into something that was a bit sportier and the idea of a German sports sedan was appealing. I traded the Jeep in on the Jetta and probably came out ok on the deal, but in the end the Jetta wasn't much more reliable than the first Jetta I owned.
Thankfully I had a warranty, but after three or four trips back to the dealership in the first six months of ownership I was less than impressed with the quality. The other major problem was that when I bought it I couldn't get the color I wanted (white, or possibly gray) so I was stuck with what the dealer had on their lot, and to get a manual transmission with the turbo engine and the options package I wanted left me with one color option... black. I hate black cars, and I really hated them after owning this Jetta.
This was also about the same time I bought my first home, and I soon realized trying to haul trees, shrubs, and building materials home in a Jetta didn't exactly work, so I started looking for a pickup. I only owned the Jetta for about a year and although it was a nice car, I can see now it was a mistake to buy it.
2004 Ford F150 FX4
I set out to buy a small used pickup... something like a Chevy S-10 or a Ford Ranger. However after test driving a Ford Ranger, I opted to test drive a full size F150 and the differences were huge. Yes it was more expensive, but at the time I sort of got wrapped up in the moment. I did like the truck and it was reliable, but I never really fell in love with the color (red and gray two-tone). I also regretted not springing for the four door truck and instead I got the extended cab version.
The F150 was also my first (and last) experience with leasing, so after 39 months it went back to Ford and I had nothing left to show for it. I decided at the time that I would never lease another vehicle and I also decided to shy away from buying anything new. I do still like F150 pickups though, and I may own another one someday, but it won't be new, and it most certainly will not be leased.
2003 Audi A6 2.7T
When the lease ran out on the F150 I opted to buy something that was considered to be a luxury automobile. I can't explain why I opted for an A6 or even why I focused on Audi, but I do recall trying to decide between an A6 and an A8. My local VW and Audi dealer is known for bloated pricing (which I learned from trying to buy VWs from them in the past) and I wasn't able to find anything locally, so I ended up buying a car via eBay.
From the moment I got the Audi I loved that car. I flew out to Cleveland, OH to buy it and I drove it all the way back to Sioux Falls. I loved the way the car drove, I love how it handled, I loved the power, I loved the options, and I really loved the color (white) - it was a great car. At first, the A6 was fairly reliable and didn't give me any troubles, and as time progressed I just had to do a few minor things. However this was at the same time that I found out I was going to be a father, and I started wondering if having an Audi was such a great idea.
I weighed the pros and cons of the Audi versus getting something like an SUV, and it was about this time I started suspecting the turbochargers were going to need to be replaced soon. I also knew the car was going to be due for a timing belt, and the front suspension needed to be replaced. All things told, if things suddenly got bad I could have been looking at $4000 to $5000 in repairs, so I opted to trade the car off and move to an SUV.
I do still miss the Audi though, and it was the nicest car I've ever owned. Because of it I have developed an affinity for Audi and fully expect to own another one in the future. I just hope I can find out that is a tad more reliable than the A6 I had.
2004 Honda Civic
I can't really say all that much about this car. My ex-wife (Katie) bought it while we were dating so technically it was never really mine. I only mention it because after my daughter was born I ended up driving the Civic while Katie drove the SUV since she was responsible for getting Tae back and forth to daycare the vast majority of the time, and we both felt it would be safer for Tae. In addition to that, I worked on the other side of town so the gas mileage was also a factor. The Civic was a reliable vehicle and was great on gas, but it just wasn't exciting to drive. In fact it was flat out boring and I almost felt embarrassed to drive it because it seemed like a "girl car" for some reason. After the divorce Katie took the Civic and she put something like 110,000 miles on it before finally selling it, so if nothing else she got her money's worth out of it.
2007 Honda Pilot EXL
I sort of purchased this on protest as I was never a huge fan of Honda Pilots. Katie wanted it and although I had agreed to trade in my Audi, I had my heart set on a white Pilot. For whatever reason, I have had this thing about white cars and felt a White Pilot looked better than any other color. My first car was white, and my Audi was white... it just seemed like the perfect color.
However, after a couple of months of shopping we were never able to find a white Pilot. So one weekend we were wasting some time at the dealership and thought maybe we should take a Pilot out on a test drive. We drove one, and it seemed nice. I hated the color (black) but Katie was really excited about getting a newer car so she pretty much had her heart set on it. Against my better judgement I opted to go for it, and a short time later we were signing the paperwork.
After our divorce I ended up with the Pilot and it was a good car. I suspect there is nothing very exciting about any Honda, and the Pilot was no exception. I never got excited about driving it like I did with previous cars, and I honestly never really cared for it. I hated the color and I was never sold on the styling, but I must say it was super reliable. I changed the oil and put gas in it... that was about it. I did have to put brakes on it, but it also had over 80,000 miles so that isn't unheard of, but aside from routine maintenance the thing just ran. I drove it for over 50,000 miles on it and it never left me stranded... it just worked.
Anyway eventually Katie decided she wanted to buy the Pilot from me, so we worked out a deal and I passed it on to her. It is still going strong and I expect it to have another 100,000 miles ahead of it if she really wants to keep it that long.
2003 Chevy S-10 ZR2
When Katie decided to buy the pilot, I was sort of under the gun to buy something quick, so I started shopping. I had been thinking about trying to get a pickup although I still liked the idea of driving a car on a daily basis and just having a truck for when I needed to haul something or when weather required four wheel drive. Therefore I opted to start shopping for a less expensive truck along with a nicer car.
After a bit of shopping and narrowing down my choices, I settled upon the S-10 with the ZR2 off-road package. I always liked the S-10 trucks ever since I was a kid, and I have memories of my grandfather buying a new GMC S-15 (the GMC equivalent of the S-10 at the time). The S-10 was discontinued in 2004 and the ZR2 package was last available on a 2003, so I knew in order to get one it was going to be a bit older and probably have higher mileage.
Thus the search began. This time around I knew I wasn't going to settle for black, and I really wanted a white one. However, finding a white S-10 was more difficult than I had anticipated, and finding one that wasn't entirely rusted out or that was in need of major repairs was difficult. I eventually found a one-owner white 2003 with zero rust, but it was up in St. Cloud, Minnesota which is about four hours away. I made the deal over the phone, and my brother and I drove up to get the truck.
Thus far I'd have to say I really like the truck. No it isn't the most powerful vehicle around, and it doesn't handle like a sports car. It had 125,000 miles on it when I bought it so there were a few things that needed to be cleaned up and the normal Chevy squeaks and rattles here and there, but overall the truck is in fantastic condition for its age, and I think I got it for a fair price.
The Next Vehicle??
Now that I have the truck to get around in, the search has started for the car which eventually will become my daily driver. I'm focusing my search on RWD or AWD four door sedans, and ideally I'd like to find a vehicle with a manual transmission. I'm looking at something that is probably about five years old because I don't want to pay depreciation of a new vehicle, and I don't want a run-on-the-mill Toyota Camry or Chevy Malibu, so it will take a little hunting to find the right vehicle.
I would consider an automatic transmission if it were a dual-clutch / sequential transmission to allow manual shifting, but I really don't think I want to go for a straight automatic. The problem is finding a sedan that happens to have a manual transmission is very, very difficult and generally limits me to only a few cars such as select vehicles from Audi or a Subaru. I also am about 90% sure I want the car to be white, although for the right car I would consider silver or gray. I can say for certain that I won't be doing black however... that much is a given.
15 cars seems like a lot I suppose, but what can I say - I just like cars. If space and money weren't an issue I'm quite sure I would probably have a dozen vehicles to suit my needs and desires on any particular day, but since space and money are always issues I suppose I'll have to limit myself to perhaps no more than two vehicles at any given moment... not counting motorcycles of course. That is very much a different topic for a different day.
Monday, November 19, 2012
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Things Even James Bond Can't Make Look Cool
With that being said, there are several things that even James Bond couldn't make look cool. What are these things you ask? Well read on:
- Eating gummy worms
- Flossing
- Tripping on his way up a flight of stairs
- Wearing skinny jeans
- Trying to run while on ice (without the special shoes made by Q)
- Hanging out at a Star Trek convention
- Wearing socks with sandals
- Clipping his nose hair
- Wearing those gigantic hipster glasses without any lenses in them
- Trying to scratch a spot on his back that is just out of reach
- Walking a tiny dog and then having to use a plastic bag to clean up the resulting "landmine"
- Driving a Smart Car
- Using a Snuggie
- Tube socks with shorts... enough said
- Utilizing a fanny pack
- Talking on a Bluetooth headset while buying ANYTHING from Walmart
- Wearing New Jersey levels of self-tanner
- Using a hula hoop
I'm sure there are many, many more - but the point is even the smoothest guy on the planet can't do everything. I mean really... could anyone actually make a Snuggie look cool?
I rest my case.
I rest my case.
Labels:
James Bond
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Bond... James Bond
I've been a fan of James Bond movies for as long as I can remember. I recall watching Bond movies every chance I got whenever they were on television and I'm sure I have seen every single movie numerous times. As a kid I fell in love with the gadgets, the watches with lasers, the cars that could double as submarines, the stunts, the action, and yes... even the Bond girls.
I also came to love the theme song, and I'd be lying if I said I didn't ever fantasize about being a government spy or actually being James Bond. The films invoked a lot of emotions from me... I suppose to some degree I have to equate them to what those horrible Twilight films do to teenage girls, but I somehow doubt Twilight will ever have the staying power to match James Bond. Or at least we can hope not... because the idea of over 20 Twilight movies is rather disturbing.
I know some people have a strong opinion on which actor was the "best" James Bond, and it seems many people prefer Sean Connery for several reasons. First of all Connery just had a certain swagger to him and was a bit of a ladies man... so he was believable as a womanizing spy type. He was also the original Bond, so to some degree he will always be associated with the role and he set the standard. Finally, Connery had staying power - he became a major Hollywood star and he had a career that spanned six decades, so he wasn't easily forgotten and to this day remains a fan favorite both for his work as James Bond, as well as his other major movie roles.
I do think Connery was a great James Bond, but his one fatal flaw was probably the fact that he never bothered to even try to fake an English accent. Then again, I don't think anyone really cared that he was Scottish... at least Scotland is still part of the UK, and since most people outside of the UK can't explain the differences between England, Great Britain, and the United Kingdom, I suspect most people heard Connery's accent and simply said "close enough!".
After Connery, George Lazenby starred as Bond in one film entitled On Her Majesty's Secret Service. I actually liked the film, but due to him only starring in the one film he isn't often mentioned when people talk about the "best" Bond. Lazenby was actually Australian rather than British so the credibility factor may have hurt him a bit, although I don't recall his accent being all that distracting. Lazenby didn't have much of a career after Bond and he was never considered a household name, so I suspect the fact that most people can't even remember his name means that he will likely never be mentioned in the same sentence as Connery or Roger Moore.
Speaking of Moore, he starred in a total of seven Bond films and some argue he was even better than Connery. I liked Moore in the role, and I probably associate him with Bond more than anyone else merely because his Bond career lasted 12 years, and his films seemed to be the ones shown on television so often. Back in the 1980s and 90s it seemed there was a Bond marathon on television about once a month, and Moore's films like Octopussy, A View to a Kill, and The Man with the Golden Gun were staples on television and I watched each of them to the point I can still quote lines from them to this day.
I will admit that although Moore was a fine actor, I never felt he was as believable in the role as Connery. I did appreciate the fact he was an English actor and as such he had the proper English accent, but the whole concept of Bond being such a ladies man was harder for me to believe with Moore in the role, and I can't really put my finger on why other than to say the scenes with him kissing women seemed almost forced rather than convincing.
After Moore retired from the Bond role, the next actor to play the role was Timothy Dalton. Many Bond fans are a bit harsh towards the Dalton films, but I have always felt it had less to do with him as an actor as it did to do with the scripts he happened to star in. Dalton has shown he has incredible acting range and he has had a strong career outside of the Bond films, and I felt he was very believable as Bond. He had that certain look, he had the proper accent, and he just pulled it off.
In truth I would have loved to see Dalton play Bond in a few more films, and in fact his original contract was for three... but due to lawsuits between studios and production companies that lasted for several years, Dalton went another direction and the search for a replacement Bond began.
Pierce Brosnan became the fifth man to play James Bond, and I still remember when it was announced that he was going to start in the next Bond film. I had become familiar with Brosnan from the television series Remington Steele and I seemed to like him as an actor so I was pretty excited to see what he was going to do as James Bond.
At the time, I felt the Brosnan-era films were the best James Bond movies to date, and he had the right mixture of charm, believability, looks, and attitude to successfully pull off the Bond role. I have a hard time picking a favorite Bond actor because time tends to blur some of what separates them, but I do think Brosnan is near the top of the list. He may not have won the praise of all the critics, and I will admit his final Bond film Die Another Day flirted with jumping the shark, but that had more do with a heavy reliance upon gadgetry and CGI than it had to do with Brosnan or his talents.
But seriously... a palace made out of ice, Madonna playing a fencing instructor, and an invisible Aston Martin? It is no wonder that the Bond producers decided to reboot the series after this movie was released.
I will say that I was fairly upset when I learned Brosnan wouldn't be starring in another Bond film, and I can still remember an interview where Brosnan was asked who should play the next James Bond where he emphatically responded with "me!". When I found out Brosnan's replacement was going to be the first blond James Bond, I was fairly certain the end of James Bond films was near.
This brings us to the current Bond played by Daniel Craig. Aside from the travesty of a blond James Bond, I will admit I was very skeptical that Craig could pull off the role. I didn't know a thing about the guy other than he was English, but when I saw him for the first time I just didn't see what the draw was. He didn't seem to have the same "Bond" look as I was used to, and I was somewhat convinced the new Bond film would be a flop.
Oh how wrong I was.
Since I'm such a Bond fan, I was more than willing to give Craig, and the new film, a fair chance. So I waited until Casino Royale was released and I watched it in the theater. To say my reservations were eliminated was an understatement, and I immediately became a fan of Daniel Craig. Not only did Craig pull of a convincing portrayal of Bond, but he added so much depth to the role. For the first time, James Bond showed legitimate emotion as well as a vulnerability which hadn't been presented in previous Bond films. In a word - Craig was credible in the role.
The fears of a blond Bond evaporated, and Craig displayed a swagger not seen since Sean Connery's 1960s-era Bond. The script was well written, the film focused more upon plot and action than they did upon CGI and gadgets, and in the end the film was able to stand on its own merits. Casino Royale didn't need to rely upon the previous four generations of Bond films, and the new realism and gritty nature of the film has made it my favorite Bond film to date. In fact I liked it so much that I actually purchased a DVD copy which I've watched numerous times.
I didn't enjoy Craig's followup film Quantum of Solace nearly as much as Casino Royale, but his performance didn't disappoint. I suppose it is somewhat unfair to claim Daniel Craig is the best James Bond to date considering the script and writing have improved so much that they might make it easier for Craig to succeed, but I do think he deserves the credit for much of the film's success. Clearly he swayed opinions and he made a lot of people eat their words (myself included), and I have no reason to doubt the next Bond film (scheduled to be released in October of this year by the way) won't continue to impress.
So who is really the best James Bond? I can't really say... because they each brought something new to the role, and they each played the character in their own way. As of this moment I'd probably lean towards Daniel Craig being my personal favorite, but I suspect my opinion may change through the filter of time. If history has shown me anything, it is that James Bond films, as well as the actors portraying him, can evolve, adapt, and improve based upon the demands of the role, so who can really say whether there is only one "best" Bond. Perhaps they are all the best in their own unique way, in their own unique time, and playing their own unique version of the iconic character that is Bond... James Bond.
I also came to love the theme song, and I'd be lying if I said I didn't ever fantasize about being a government spy or actually being James Bond. The films invoked a lot of emotions from me... I suppose to some degree I have to equate them to what those horrible Twilight films do to teenage girls, but I somehow doubt Twilight will ever have the staying power to match James Bond. Or at least we can hope not... because the idea of over 20 Twilight movies is rather disturbing.
I know some people have a strong opinion on which actor was the "best" James Bond, and it seems many people prefer Sean Connery for several reasons. First of all Connery just had a certain swagger to him and was a bit of a ladies man... so he was believable as a womanizing spy type. He was also the original Bond, so to some degree he will always be associated with the role and he set the standard. Finally, Connery had staying power - he became a major Hollywood star and he had a career that spanned six decades, so he wasn't easily forgotten and to this day remains a fan favorite both for his work as James Bond, as well as his other major movie roles.
I do think Connery was a great James Bond, but his one fatal flaw was probably the fact that he never bothered to even try to fake an English accent. Then again, I don't think anyone really cared that he was Scottish... at least Scotland is still part of the UK, and since most people outside of the UK can't explain the differences between England, Great Britain, and the United Kingdom, I suspect most people heard Connery's accent and simply said "close enough!".
After Connery, George Lazenby starred as Bond in one film entitled On Her Majesty's Secret Service. I actually liked the film, but due to him only starring in the one film he isn't often mentioned when people talk about the "best" Bond. Lazenby was actually Australian rather than British so the credibility factor may have hurt him a bit, although I don't recall his accent being all that distracting. Lazenby didn't have much of a career after Bond and he was never considered a household name, so I suspect the fact that most people can't even remember his name means that he will likely never be mentioned in the same sentence as Connery or Roger Moore.
Speaking of Moore, he starred in a total of seven Bond films and some argue he was even better than Connery. I liked Moore in the role, and I probably associate him with Bond more than anyone else merely because his Bond career lasted 12 years, and his films seemed to be the ones shown on television so often. Back in the 1980s and 90s it seemed there was a Bond marathon on television about once a month, and Moore's films like Octopussy, A View to a Kill, and The Man with the Golden Gun were staples on television and I watched each of them to the point I can still quote lines from them to this day.
I will admit that although Moore was a fine actor, I never felt he was as believable in the role as Connery. I did appreciate the fact he was an English actor and as such he had the proper English accent, but the whole concept of Bond being such a ladies man was harder for me to believe with Moore in the role, and I can't really put my finger on why other than to say the scenes with him kissing women seemed almost forced rather than convincing.
After Moore retired from the Bond role, the next actor to play the role was Timothy Dalton. Many Bond fans are a bit harsh towards the Dalton films, but I have always felt it had less to do with him as an actor as it did to do with the scripts he happened to star in. Dalton has shown he has incredible acting range and he has had a strong career outside of the Bond films, and I felt he was very believable as Bond. He had that certain look, he had the proper accent, and he just pulled it off.
In truth I would have loved to see Dalton play Bond in a few more films, and in fact his original contract was for three... but due to lawsuits between studios and production companies that lasted for several years, Dalton went another direction and the search for a replacement Bond began.
Pierce Brosnan became the fifth man to play James Bond, and I still remember when it was announced that he was going to start in the next Bond film. I had become familiar with Brosnan from the television series Remington Steele and I seemed to like him as an actor so I was pretty excited to see what he was going to do as James Bond.
At the time, I felt the Brosnan-era films were the best James Bond movies to date, and he had the right mixture of charm, believability, looks, and attitude to successfully pull off the Bond role. I have a hard time picking a favorite Bond actor because time tends to blur some of what separates them, but I do think Brosnan is near the top of the list. He may not have won the praise of all the critics, and I will admit his final Bond film Die Another Day flirted with jumping the shark, but that had more do with a heavy reliance upon gadgetry and CGI than it had to do with Brosnan or his talents.
But seriously... a palace made out of ice, Madonna playing a fencing instructor, and an invisible Aston Martin? It is no wonder that the Bond producers decided to reboot the series after this movie was released.
I will say that I was fairly upset when I learned Brosnan wouldn't be starring in another Bond film, and I can still remember an interview where Brosnan was asked who should play the next James Bond where he emphatically responded with "me!". When I found out Brosnan's replacement was going to be the first blond James Bond, I was fairly certain the end of James Bond films was near.
This brings us to the current Bond played by Daniel Craig. Aside from the travesty of a blond James Bond, I will admit I was very skeptical that Craig could pull off the role. I didn't know a thing about the guy other than he was English, but when I saw him for the first time I just didn't see what the draw was. He didn't seem to have the same "Bond" look as I was used to, and I was somewhat convinced the new Bond film would be a flop.
Oh how wrong I was.
Since I'm such a Bond fan, I was more than willing to give Craig, and the new film, a fair chance. So I waited until Casino Royale was released and I watched it in the theater. To say my reservations were eliminated was an understatement, and I immediately became a fan of Daniel Craig. Not only did Craig pull of a convincing portrayal of Bond, but he added so much depth to the role. For the first time, James Bond showed legitimate emotion as well as a vulnerability which hadn't been presented in previous Bond films. In a word - Craig was credible in the role.
The fears of a blond Bond evaporated, and Craig displayed a swagger not seen since Sean Connery's 1960s-era Bond. The script was well written, the film focused more upon plot and action than they did upon CGI and gadgets, and in the end the film was able to stand on its own merits. Casino Royale didn't need to rely upon the previous four generations of Bond films, and the new realism and gritty nature of the film has made it my favorite Bond film to date. In fact I liked it so much that I actually purchased a DVD copy which I've watched numerous times.
I didn't enjoy Craig's followup film Quantum of Solace nearly as much as Casino Royale, but his performance didn't disappoint. I suppose it is somewhat unfair to claim Daniel Craig is the best James Bond to date considering the script and writing have improved so much that they might make it easier for Craig to succeed, but I do think he deserves the credit for much of the film's success. Clearly he swayed opinions and he made a lot of people eat their words (myself included), and I have no reason to doubt the next Bond film (scheduled to be released in October of this year by the way) won't continue to impress.
So who is really the best James Bond? I can't really say... because they each brought something new to the role, and they each played the character in their own way. As of this moment I'd probably lean towards Daniel Craig being my personal favorite, but I suspect my opinion may change through the filter of time. If history has shown me anything, it is that James Bond films, as well as the actors portraying him, can evolve, adapt, and improve based upon the demands of the role, so who can really say whether there is only one "best" Bond. Perhaps they are all the best in their own unique way, in their own unique time, and playing their own unique version of the iconic character that is Bond... James Bond.
Labels:
James Bond
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Online Dating Feature Translator
Note: This post includes sarcasm and humor. If you don't have a sense of humor, can't laugh at the world around you, and/or you are easily offended... you might want to avoid reading it. On the other hand if you don't take everything quite so seriously then by all means read on.
I've had a bit of experience in the online dating world, and I've learned a few things along the way. The most obvious thing I have learned is that people are less than honest about how they represent themselves in their dating profiles, and with a bit of knowledge you can do a much better job of interpreting what some of these key terms actually mean.
Bubbly Personality: If you read a profile that indicates the person has a "bubbly personality" it probably means they won't stop talking for more than 20 seconds at a time - even while eating a meal. These are the types of people who feel that the number of words coming out of their mouth is actually more important than the words themselves. In short this is like dating someone who acts like they have drank six cups of coffee and slammed two Red Bulls within the last 30 minutes. Much like alcohol and fast food, these are the types of people who are best in moderation.
Athletic: This is a tough one. This can often mean that a woman is referring to her build rather than the type of activities she is interested in. In many cases it means they like to shoot pool or play darts, and they have been known to go bowling, but in other times it simply means they are stocky and look like a softball player... even though they don't play softball. What it does not mean is that they are the type who works out five days a week and has a washboard stomach nor does it mean she is known to wear sports bras and go for a nightly run. Keep dreaming.
Enjoy being treated like a lady: This simply means she has no intention of paying for any dates, and you had better be prepared to go to a nice restaurant, so scratch Applebee's off the list. This also means she will most likely need to get her eyebrows waxed every three weeks, her nails done at least once a month, and she very well may have a membership to a local tanning salon. In short - she is high maintenance, and she knows it. Be prepared to open a lot of doors and don't be shocked if a date gets ruined due to a broken nail at some point.
Fun-Loving: As much as you may want to think this means she enjoys ice skating and trips to Disneyland, it really means her idea of a good time involves a small town bar, a karaoke machine, and numerous rounds of stale tap beer. There is also a high probability that she has had the same friends since high school, and they have a strong desire to talk about their high school classmates even though they graduated sometime in the 90s.
Drama-Free: This typically means her last relationship included a lot of screaming and yelling and perhaps at least one visit from the local police after neighbors called in a possible domestic disturbance. She assumes because they broke up that there will be no more drama and she assumes the former boyfriend and/or husband was the problem. Oddly enough she claims three of her four last ex-boyfriends were all responsible for untold amounts of drama, and if you end up dating her you can anticipate a fight that results in her either threatening to kill herself or one in which she is sitting in the driveway blocking your car as she cries her eyes out and tells you how special you are. Run. Don't even think about engaging her in conversation... just run.
Goal Oriented: This typically means she attended a reputable College or University and earned her degree and/or is currently pursuing a degree, and that she has goals. The goals typically include having anywhere from two to four children, driving a Lexus, and marrying someone who either has a trust fund or currently makes at least six-figures. Oh yea... and they also want to travel to Europe and/or vacation in Mexico at least once every other year.
Goal Orientated: See "Goal Oriented" above, and instead of a college degree from a reputable College or University just assume they attended (or possibly graduated from) a local Community College.
Carefree: Chances are she has at least three collection agencies looking for her, and she hasn't been tested for STDs since the Clinton administration. This is the type of women who might be fun to date once or twice because that is about as long as she will remain interested.
Shaped like women should be: There is no nice way of saying this... if a woman brags that she is shaped like women should be, it simply means she is overweight. Worse than that, she won't admit she is overweight and thus she feels society should adapt to her version of "normal" even if it means her BMI is somewhere north of 30. She will try to fit into clothing that is far too small and she will insist on wearing pants that are so tight that she will have a permanent muffin-top spilling out from her waist. She will also be known to exceed the tensile strength on most of the fabrics she wraps around her body and it isn't unheard of for women like this to carry safety pins and duct tape to address various wardrobe malfunctions if and when they do occur. If you do decide to date a woman like this, I'd suggest wearing eye protection anytime she wears something with buttons because a button under pressure is like a ticking time-bomb and can seriously injure someone when it lets go.
Curvy: This can be a couple of different things. In rare instances, this could be a very average sized woman who is not entirely comfortable with her body. In other cases, it could be a thin woman who has had breast implants and who is very proud of them, but in the vast majority of the time it simply means the woman has a very large backside and instead of trying some targeted exercises to tone up, she is more interested in buying bras from Victoria Secret that will push her breasts together with such force that it can create an optical illusion that tricks the viewer into thinking her breasts and behind are in direct proportion to one another. Let there be no doubt, curves on a woman are sexy, but there is a difference between legitimate curves, and the type of woman who waves hello and her arm stops moving six seconds after her hand.
There you have it - just a few tips to let you know what you might come across. There are many others of course, but I can't possible cover every scenario here, but it should give you a good head start. Above all else just remember that when it comes to online dating, people are generally liars, and it is in your best interests to remain skeptical about almost anything that comes out of the mouth of the other person until you have time to verify it for yourself. Online dating profiles are a lot like print ads for fast food places... they look nice and peak your interest, but the real thing is often a disappointment.
I've had a bit of experience in the online dating world, and I've learned a few things along the way. The most obvious thing I have learned is that people are less than honest about how they represent themselves in their dating profiles, and with a bit of knowledge you can do a much better job of interpreting what some of these key terms actually mean.
Bubbly Personality: If you read a profile that indicates the person has a "bubbly personality" it probably means they won't stop talking for more than 20 seconds at a time - even while eating a meal. These are the types of people who feel that the number of words coming out of their mouth is actually more important than the words themselves. In short this is like dating someone who acts like they have drank six cups of coffee and slammed two Red Bulls within the last 30 minutes. Much like alcohol and fast food, these are the types of people who are best in moderation.
Athletic: This is a tough one. This can often mean that a woman is referring to her build rather than the type of activities she is interested in. In many cases it means they like to shoot pool or play darts, and they have been known to go bowling, but in other times it simply means they are stocky and look like a softball player... even though they don't play softball. What it does not mean is that they are the type who works out five days a week and has a washboard stomach nor does it mean she is known to wear sports bras and go for a nightly run. Keep dreaming.
Enjoy being treated like a lady: This simply means she has no intention of paying for any dates, and you had better be prepared to go to a nice restaurant, so scratch Applebee's off the list. This also means she will most likely need to get her eyebrows waxed every three weeks, her nails done at least once a month, and she very well may have a membership to a local tanning salon. In short - she is high maintenance, and she knows it. Be prepared to open a lot of doors and don't be shocked if a date gets ruined due to a broken nail at some point.
Fun-Loving: As much as you may want to think this means she enjoys ice skating and trips to Disneyland, it really means her idea of a good time involves a small town bar, a karaoke machine, and numerous rounds of stale tap beer. There is also a high probability that she has had the same friends since high school, and they have a strong desire to talk about their high school classmates even though they graduated sometime in the 90s.
Drama-Free: This typically means her last relationship included a lot of screaming and yelling and perhaps at least one visit from the local police after neighbors called in a possible domestic disturbance. She assumes because they broke up that there will be no more drama and she assumes the former boyfriend and/or husband was the problem. Oddly enough she claims three of her four last ex-boyfriends were all responsible for untold amounts of drama, and if you end up dating her you can anticipate a fight that results in her either threatening to kill herself or one in which she is sitting in the driveway blocking your car as she cries her eyes out and tells you how special you are. Run. Don't even think about engaging her in conversation... just run.
Goal Oriented: This typically means she attended a reputable College or University and earned her degree and/or is currently pursuing a degree, and that she has goals. The goals typically include having anywhere from two to four children, driving a Lexus, and marrying someone who either has a trust fund or currently makes at least six-figures. Oh yea... and they also want to travel to Europe and/or vacation in Mexico at least once every other year.
Goal Orientated: See "Goal Oriented" above, and instead of a college degree from a reputable College or University just assume they attended (or possibly graduated from) a local Community College.
Carefree: Chances are she has at least three collection agencies looking for her, and she hasn't been tested for STDs since the Clinton administration. This is the type of women who might be fun to date once or twice because that is about as long as she will remain interested.
Shaped like women should be: There is no nice way of saying this... if a woman brags that she is shaped like women should be, it simply means she is overweight. Worse than that, she won't admit she is overweight and thus she feels society should adapt to her version of "normal" even if it means her BMI is somewhere north of 30. She will try to fit into clothing that is far too small and she will insist on wearing pants that are so tight that she will have a permanent muffin-top spilling out from her waist. She will also be known to exceed the tensile strength on most of the fabrics she wraps around her body and it isn't unheard of for women like this to carry safety pins and duct tape to address various wardrobe malfunctions if and when they do occur. If you do decide to date a woman like this, I'd suggest wearing eye protection anytime she wears something with buttons because a button under pressure is like a ticking time-bomb and can seriously injure someone when it lets go.
Curvy: This can be a couple of different things. In rare instances, this could be a very average sized woman who is not entirely comfortable with her body. In other cases, it could be a thin woman who has had breast implants and who is very proud of them, but in the vast majority of the time it simply means the woman has a very large backside and instead of trying some targeted exercises to tone up, she is more interested in buying bras from Victoria Secret that will push her breasts together with such force that it can create an optical illusion that tricks the viewer into thinking her breasts and behind are in direct proportion to one another. Let there be no doubt, curves on a woman are sexy, but there is a difference between legitimate curves, and the type of woman who waves hello and her arm stops moving six seconds after her hand.
There you have it - just a few tips to let you know what you might come across. There are many others of course, but I can't possible cover every scenario here, but it should give you a good head start. Above all else just remember that when it comes to online dating, people are generally liars, and it is in your best interests to remain skeptical about almost anything that comes out of the mouth of the other person until you have time to verify it for yourself. Online dating profiles are a lot like print ads for fast food places... they look nice and peak your interest, but the real thing is often a disappointment.
Labels:
dating,
humor,
Online Dating
Monday, July 16, 2012
My Thoughts On: Dog Breed Bans
Q: What is the most common phrase uttered by a neighbor when they find out the guy who has lived next door to them turns out to be a serial killer?
A: "He was always so quiet and he kept to himself"
Q: What is the most common phrase uttered by a dog owner after their dog ends up biting, mauling, injuring, or even killing someone?
Q: What is the most common phrase uttered by a dog owner after their dog ends up biting, mauling, injuring, or even killing someone?
A: "He was always so kind and gentle and great with children"
Sometimes things aren't always as they seem, and idiotic platitudes don't really change the facts. Like it or not, some dogs are capable of doing much more damage than others. Temperament might have something to do with it, but when a small dog bites someone, chances are the damage can be addressed with a band-aid rather than a trip to the ER. Due to the jaw structure and power of some larger breeds, they can easily result in massive injuries or even deaths.
Check the statistics surrounding dog bite fatalities, and you will soon find that Pit Bulls (and their associated mixes) as well as Rottweilers are responsible for a vast majority of the deaths. This isn't opinion, but rather it is supported by hard evidence, including several studies on the subject as well as government data.
Since numbers without context are meaningless, lets ask ourselves if we find it feasible that these same breeds make up the vast majority of dogs in the US? I think most people would agree that isn't the case... in fact per AKC registrations, where Labrador Retrievers are consistently the most popular dog, and Bull Terriers come in somewhere south of 50th most popular, these statistics SHOULD alarm everyone. What we should see is Labrador Retrievers being responsible for the most dog bites simply due to statistical averages. However that isn't the case, and when speaking of significant injuries and/or deaths the numbers are even further skewed.
The facts are that certain breeds of dogs have a higher propensity to maul, injure, and kill. We can blame this on humans for a lack of training, we can blame it on the breed, or we can blame it on specific dogs, but the facts are the facts. If you read the actual reports from many of these dog bite fatalities, you will find that in many cases the owners had never witnessed any hostility from the dogs in the past, and at one point the dog(s) just snapped. I dare say no matter how well trained they are, almost any dog can still revert to their instincts in some situations, and in some cases those instincts can result in significant injury.
When you boil it down and remove the emotion to simply look at the statistics and the facts, you soon realize that it is an indisputable fact that Pit Bulls and Rottweilers are dangerous when compared to other breeds. That isn't to say other dog breeds are never dangerous, or that other dog breeds aren't responsible for injuries or deaths, or that certain Pit Bulls and Rottweilers aren't the gentle and peaceful dogs that so many owners claim they are... it is just a fact that as a whole, these dogs are more dangerous.
It is like comparing a modern Volkswagen with 10 airbags, ABS, stability control, crumble zones, and active head restraints to a 1950s Volkswagen with no seat belts, no crumple zones, no airbags, and doors that were less than three inches thick. One of these is clearly more dangerous than the other, but it may never be obvious until it is too late.
Now I should note that I am not sure breed bans actually work, thus I'm not sure they are the answer. Some people who are very much opposed to such breed bans are quick to point out that some people will go out of their way to get a dog that is banned because they think it makes them part of some secret club. I imagine these types of people are also the type of people who like to carry around concealed, unregistered firearms and who do whatever they can to show others that they don't follow the commonly accepted rules that society has instilled upon itself.
The reality is there is always going to be a certain type of person who is attracted to Pit Bull type dogs because they want to have that "wow" factor and they want to be seen as a rule breaker. Just walk though the more "colorful" parts of any city and you are bound to see countless examples of how certain types of people attract certain types of pets. Everyone knows areas like this - these are the areas where you find people with a tattoo to limb ratio above 3:1, and people standing around the street corners wearing their flat brimmed hats over their ears. When these people are out walking their dogs what breeds do you think are most common? I'll give you a hit... it isn't a Yorkie or a Chihuahua.
So yes some people might help contribute to certain breeds having a bad reputation, but when a dog is bred to do certain things, those traits can come to the surface even if they aren't desired, and characteristics that were bred into a dog over the course of hundreds of years don't just disappear in a few generations. For many of these dogs, a certain aggressiveness is their nature, and I hope many of the same people telling us how sweet and innocent and kind their Pit Bulls are never have to experience an event that would make them change those opinions.
Perhaps we should simply mandate anyone who wants to have one of these dogs registered within city limits needs to be bonded for any potential damage it may cause. The size of the bond needs to be tied to the risk factor... which shouldn't be too hard to obtain since insurance companies already have a pretty good idea of which breeds are more likely to result in their claim payouts being higher (and oddly enough some insurance companies won't offer homeowners insurance to a person who owns a Pit Bull type dog). If someone is found to not have their dog licensed or bonded, then that dog needs to be confiscated from them and they need to be fined at a level which would prevent them from ever doing it again ($500 to $1000).
Finally, I'm not the type of suggest we euthanize any dog which has not shown aggression, but if and when a dog does bite or maul someone it should be put down no questions asked, and again the owner should be held responsible via fines (and likely a nice civil court case from the victim or victims).
Clearly there are other ways to address the concerns with certain dog breeds other than breed specific bans, since people find clever ways of getting around such bans in the first place. The fact is, unless a city is going to perform DNA checks on dogs, it is difficult to prove that a dog is primarily a banned breed rather than a mix with only a small portion of that specific breed. However, I dare say that as long as people remain ignorant to the facts surrounding dog bites and the breeds most involved, and as long as people continue to make claims about how these very same breeds are gentle and loving and would never harm a fly... well then we will continue to see articles in the paper and reports on television of people being maimed and even killed by these same breeds time and time again.
Labels:
Breed Bans,
Dog Bites,
My Thoughts On,
Pit Bulls
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




